Survivors of clergy abuse carry a particular kind of shame, and it usually attaches to the same handful of facts. I went back. I did not tell anyone. I liked the attention. I loved him. For a long time I thought it was a friendship.
Those facts feel like evidence of complicity. They are not. They are the expected results of a documented process, executed deliberately by an adult on a child, and researchers have mapped it in detail.
Understanding grooming is not an academic exercise. For many survivors it is the moment the blame finally moves to where it belongs.
What Grooming Actually Is
Grooming is the deliberate process by which someone prepares a child for sexual abuse while simultaneously making disclosure unlikely and detection difficult. It is not a synonym for "being nice to a kid." It is a strategy with a purpose, and research indicates it precedes nearly all child sexual abuse.
The critical point is that grooming has two targets. The first is the child. The second is everyone who might otherwise protect the child — parents, other clergy, teachers, the congregation. When that second target has been groomed successfully, a child's disclosure is met with disbelief from the people best positioned to act. That is not an accident. That is the design.
The Five Stages
Researchers Georgia Winters and Elizabeth Jeglic developed and validated a Sexual Grooming Model that organizes the process into five observable stages. We use their framework here because it is peer-reviewed and behavior-based rather than speculative.
1. Victim Selection
The adult identifies a child who is more accessible and less likely to be believed. Vulnerability can be emotional — a lonely child, a child with low self-esteem, a child hungry for adult attention — or situational: a single parent working long hours, a family in crisis, parental conflict or illness, a household with limited supervision.
In a church setting, this information is unusually easy to acquire. A priest or youth pastor may know which father just left, which mother is ill, which teenager is struggling. Pastoral care produces exactly the knowledge that selection requires.
2. Gaining Access and Isolation
The adult creates opportunities to be alone with the child, and frames each one as legitimate. Altar server training. A ride home. Help with the church van. A retreat, a mission trip, a lock-in, a summer camp. One-on-one "mentoring" or spiritual direction.
Religious roles supply access automatically, which is why youth-serving organizations are disproportionately represented in abuse cases. No one questions why the youth pastor is driving a fifteen-year-old home alone.
3. Trust Development
The adult builds genuine trust — with the child and, crucially, with the adults around the child. Gifts, money, rule-bending, being the one adult who "gets it," sharing confidences, treating the child as uniquely mature.
With the family, the same work is done in a different register: becoming indispensable, offering help, being the trusted figure a struggling family is grateful for. Parents often end up actively encouraging the time alone.
This stage is why so many survivors say "I loved him." That affection was real, and it was manufactured on purpose. Both things are true at once, and holding them together is one of the hardest parts of recovery.
4. Desensitization to Sexual Content and Touch
Boundaries are eroded gradually, never abruptly. Ordinary affectionate touch becomes prolonged. Wrestling, tickling, back rubs. Conversations about the child's body or sexual development framed as guidance. Exposure to sexual material framed as education. Walking in while the child is changing, presented as accidental.
Each step is small enough to seem explicable. That incrementalism is precisely the point: it means there is rarely a clear moment where a child can say "this is when it became wrong," which is exactly what makes disclosure so difficult later.
5. Post-Abuse Maintenance
After abuse begins, the adult works to keep it going and keep it hidden. Sometimes through explicit threats. Far more often through something worse: framing the abuse as mutual, as a shared secret, as love, as the child's own choice. Emphasizing what disclosure would destroy — the parish, the abuser's ministry, the child's family, the child's own reputation.
A child who has been persuaded they participated does not report, because in their own mind there is nothing to report except their own guilt. That belief frequently survives into middle age.
Why Religious Authority Makes Grooming Worse
Every element above is more effective in a faith setting.
A clergy member is often presented to a child as standing in a special relationship to God. Their approval can feel like divine approval, and their disapproval like something worse. The vocabulary of faith — obedience, honoring authority, forgiveness, the sacredness of confession, the sin of gossip — can be turned into an apparatus for silence. Survivors describe being told that reporting would be a betrayal of the church, that forgiveness was required of them, that doubting a priest was itself sinful.
And the congregation is groomed too. When a survivor finally speaks, the community's instinct is to defend the man they know. That is the most devastating part for many survivors, and it is the predictable end product of years of deliberate work.
Why It Was Not Your Fault — Including in Law
Let us be precise about this rather than merely reassuring.
A child cannot consent to sexual contact with an adult. That is not a moral opinion, it is the law. Whether you went back, whether you kept the secret, whether you felt love, whether you sought the attention — none of it creates consent, and none of it is a defense.
Everything you did was an adaptation, not a choice. Returning to the person who is abusing you is one of the most common survivor behaviors on record, because that person had already been established as the source of attention, status, and care. Continuing to love them is not a failure of judgment. It is what successful grooming produces.
The delay was engineered. With an average disclosure age of 52, the silence you may have carried for decades is the outcome the grooming was designed to achieve. You did not fail to report. You were made not to.
Grooming Is Also Legally Significant
Beyond its meaning for survivors, grooming matters in litigation:
- It is often visible from the outside. Favoritism, gifts, unexplained one-on-one time, a child singled out for special access — these are observable behaviors, and other adults frequently noticed them at the time. That goes to whether the institution should have acted.
- It establishes a pattern. Grooming behavior is consistent across victims. When several survivors describe the same escalation with the same person, that pattern becomes powerful evidence.
- It answers the delay defense. When an institution argues that a survivor waited too long, the grooming record explains precisely why — because silence was one of the intended products.
- It can be explained to a jury by experts. Grooming is a researched, measurable phenomenon, not a theory, and qualified experts testify about it.
If You Are Recognizing Yourself in This
Some survivors read a description of grooming and feel relief. Others feel the floor drop out, because it recasts a relationship they had understood as meaningful. Both reactions are common and neither is wrong.
You do not have to do anything with this today. If you would like support, our page on support and healing resources lists organizations that help survivors regardless of whether they ever pursue a legal claim.
And if you want to know what your legal options are, that conversation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation. Contact us or call (713) 224-5529. You will not be asked to justify anything.
Related reading
- Finding Support and Healing Resources for Survivors of Clergy Abuse
- What Evidence Do You Need to File a Clergy Abuse Lawsuit?
- How Churches Are Held Legally Responsible for Clergy Abuse
Sources
- Winters & Jeglic — Stages of Sexual Grooming: Recognizing Potentially Predatory Behaviors of Child Molesters (Deviant Behavior)
- Winters & Jeglic — Validation of the Sexual Grooming Model of Child Sexual Abusers (Journal of Child Sexual Abuse)
- National Children's Alliance — The Real Red Flags of Grooming
- CHILD USA — Delayed Disclosure fact sheet (2024)
This article is general legal information about Texas law, current as of September 2026. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the specific facts of your case. Please speak with a lawyer about your own situation.